Category Archives: Living Life

Blogs and vlogs.

Pestering Dogs and Pouncing Cats

It happens all too frequently, I miss opportunities to capture photographs or the photos that I capture aren’t inspired or inspiring. This year the weather seems slow to pick up and there have been a lot of days when I wished there were better light, or more of it. Things sometimes just don’t come together, and the time you have available outside of working hours simply doesn’t marry up with opportunities to find subjects and take photos.

I did happen  on an imposing figure: A Jaguar hood ornament on a very nice XK Signature. Lovely car to drive (though not so much fun getting in and out of), and the hood ornament looked rather striking in the early morning light, glistening with melting frost. I took full advantage of the Galaxy S5’s close focus and depth of field.

Jaguar hood ornament
Maisie wants to go out

A major advantage for me with having a dog is that I’m perpetually nagged to go out. If it were not for Maisie I’m sure that apart from going to work and going shopping, I might not leave the house for days on end. Since I’m walking the dog anyway, I take my camera with me and that at least gives some opportunity for photos. It doesn’t guarantee good photos, or even photos at all, but it does improve the odds massively.

From Stark Bank Road, looking towards Ellingstring
St Nicholas’, West Tanfield – infrared 720nm

On Tuesday, Sheryl and I decided to take a drive out into the Dales. We did this every week last year but I don’t think I’ll be able to afford it as often this year. My car isn’t doing very well on fuel at the moment – I’m guestimating about 23mpg on average – and needs some money spending on it. Nevertheless, we bit the bullet and threw £20 in the tank to go see some sights. We drove in a wide circle over to Tadcaster, then on to Ripon, had a coffee in Masham and then drove over the tops to Kettlewell, back into the Aire valley via Skipton and on home over Ilkley/Rombalds Moor. It was a lovely drive out which blew away some cobwebs, and we did get some photos along the way.

St Nicholas’, West Tanfield – inside

At West Tanfield we found St Nicholas’ Church, with accompanying graveyard, and I decided to try a bit of infrared photography despite there being no direct sun. The results came out pretty well and better than I was expecting. I’d not tried infrared on a cloudy day before, so that opens up the possibilities for future outings even if the weather isn’t with us so much. We took a few minutes to look around inside the church and Marmion Tower, and learn some history, before moving on.

All in all it was a good day out and I’m looking forward to more like it as the summer gets underway. 🙂

In Focus

My phone recently died and I had to quickly replace it. I did so with a Samsung Galaxy S5. Not the latest phone – a couple of years and a couple of generations old – but reportedly with one of the best cameras of any smartphone.

It’s definitely leaps and bounds ahead of my last phone, the Umi Touch, and it’s absolutely spot on for selfies and for general photography. It’s not a replacement for my DSLR, though, which means I’m going to be lugging that around with me still for the foreseeable future.

Years of bitter experience have taught me that if I don’t have a camera with me then I run the risk of missing either an important moment or a creative opportunity. My smartphone being what it is, I think the risk of missing an important moment is significantly diminished. My phone is always in my pocket, so it’s almost immediately available to catch anything of significance.

This week I wanted to find out if my smartphone could provide a solution for the creative moment. I took my DSLR and smartphone out to take photos, and attempted to loosely replicate one with the other. I have to say that the smartphone comes up short.

Smartphone

Because of the smartphone’s small sensor, it’s well suited to shooting macro photos. The sensor’s small size makes it possible to get huge depth of field, which is normally gold dust in macro photography. Of course, strictly speaking this isn’t macro, it’s close-up photography.

DSLR

I was using a general purpose lens (17-55mm) to capture this shot, rather than a macro or close-up lens. The background is nicely thrown out of focus but also much of the foreground. On balance, the smartphone wins here.

Smartphone

Colour balance is out of whack on this photo, but I think that’s my fault rather than the smartphone’s. Again, most of the daffodils are easily in focus. Unfortunately the distant background is also almost in focus. It can be challenging to create separation between the foreground and background. This is where DSLRs excel.

DSLR

The results from the DSLR are a little grungy. It wasn’t good light at all, but the white balance is better. This is because I can shoot RAW images with the DSLR but I can only shoot JPG with the smartphone. Adjusting things like white balance after the fact is a fairly simple process with RAW images, but attempting the same with JPG can easily destroy images. Nevertheless, I think the smartphone wins out in this comparison. The DSLR image just doesn’t compete.

Smartphone

You can tell that it wasn’t the best day, weather-wise. This was as nice a shot as you could have asked for on the day I took this shot. The result from the smartphone is admirable.

DSLR

The result from the DSLR is better. Not a whole load better, but it is. And again, because I can shoot RAW images, I have a host of options available to me after I’ve taken the photo that aren’t available, or are only limitedly available, with the smartphone photo.

So far these photos have been more documentary than creative. On the creative front is where the DSLR gives significant latitude while the smartphone’s JPG file is severely constrained.

Smartphone

A single leaf on an otherwise bare branch. The smartphone documents it perfectly well. But where is the message? Where’s the soul? I can inject some meaning with the use of Instagram filters, I guess, or even the Adobe Photoshop freebie mobile app.

Smartphone // Adobe Photoshop Express

It’s really not what I was looking for, though it’s as close as I can get given the issues with the JPG format. Honestly, it looks shonky. It doesn’t convey the moment, though, and that’s the problem. But hey, it looks artsy. At least a little, anyway.

DSLR // Camera RAW adjustments

This is what I was looking for. To get it, I needed to have manual control over the camera’s settings and I needed access to the significant data behind the RAW image: A defiant Autumn colour clinging on until the following Spring.

The Best Camera is the One That’s With You

“The best camera is the one that’s with you” is the title of a 2009 book by Chase Jarvis. With his book about iPhone photography, Jarvis popularised the notion of the smartphone camera revolution. An accomplished photographer, Jarvis’ acknowledgement of the smartphone as a new era of popular photography was significant.

At the time Jarvis released his book (and Apple Store “Best Camera” application) the iPhone was the most feature-rich and impressively performing smartphone camera. Other phone manufacturers were quick to recognise the significance of the camera to the worth of their smartphones and, in the years since, have also advanced fantastic quality camera smartphones to market. In 2010 the release of Instagram to iPhone users, with its plethora of post-process filters and enhancements, and its 2012 release on the Android platform finally meant that expressive smartphone photography had become cross-platform and therefore accessible to everyone.

Usage statistics for Instagram are impressive. As of last year, an average of 80 million photos per day are shared on the app, accruing 3.5 billion likes daily. More photos than were taken during the entire 19th century are now taken every two minutes. Amazing numbers.

How did we get here?

Photography has gone through several significant innovations over the years since it was first invented. From its start as a large format medium, with complicated development processes and huge levels of skill required to produce quality images, through the lower resolution 35mm revolution, the advent of colour film, the digital SLR revolution, the “point & shoot” digital camera and now the smartphone, photography has repeatedly broken ranks with its own advocates. At each stage, the “purist” photographers have resisted these changes. Ultimately, though, each innovation has become the norm and at each stage, directly because of these innovations, photography has become more accessible, photographers more prolific and their images more widely seen.

Where to next?

It’s impossible to predict the future. There are still some obstacles in the path of smartphones, but I can’t say they’re impossible to overcome. At the moment a smartphone can’t match a DSLR for reach. The physical dimensions of the smartphone alone mean that it is not possible, optically, to deliver on telephoto images of comparable or even adequate quality. The image sensor in a smartphone is very small because the optics in the camera’s lens are required to be very compact. In order to capture a telephoto image, a “long” lens is required. A long lens on a smartphone would radically alter the dimensions and form factor of the smartphone itself. Right now, that doesn’t seem plausible. But the leading edge of technology is far ahead of where we think it is. The most recent innovations we tend to see are at most proofs of concept. But this is far behind where technology usually is. So who knows? But we do know that the innovations necessary to make the smartphone camera the only camera you might ever need is still at least some way off.

We do know the digital point and shoot is dead at this point. There is no future for a low quality image camera that may fit in your pocket but doesn’t have the ability to share on Instagram or Facebook, and you can’t make a phone call on or chat and share on WhatsApp.

But there is still no viable pocket device to match the photographic versatility of the DSLR. At least for now, there’s no reason to believe that this particular medium is dead. But, as Chase Jarvis quite rightly says, the best camera is the one that’s with you. The DSLR is cumbersome but the smartphone is not, and that means that it is more likely that the best camera – adequate for the task or not – is not the DSLR that you left at home but the smartphone, right there in your pocket.

Saturation

Spring is beginning to show. It’s  a slow and very gradual process but there are signs that we’re turning the corner. Flowers are beginning to erupt in meadows and some trees are even beginning to blossom. They’re few and far between but they’re still turning up.

Days are getting longer. The windows of opportunity to catch some brighter skies outside of working hours during the week are expanding, and we start with the best hour too… “Golden Hour” – the last hour before sunset, when the sun’s light takes on a wonderful golden glow. As long as it’s not cloudy, of course. Generally, during this process, photographers like me begin to feel like photographers again. The obstacles in the way of taking photos at leisure gradually fall away as the sun climbs higher and higher in the sky, and as subjects begin to present themselves more readily.

Life everywhere is beginning to reappear, and it feels good.

My favourite seasons are Spring and Autumn, not just because of the variety in colour in those two seasons but also the variability in weather. Spring, I find, brings the best mix of sky and clouds. I love the colours in a sun-drenched scene with thundery blue-grey clouds in the background. That mix of texture is the thing I miss most about Spring in the depths of other seasons.

Here in the North of England, Autumn colours are usually fleeting and it’s not uncommon for the leaves to turn their amazing shades of gold and copper and then shed completely without a single sunny day for photographers to take advantage of their spectacle. Spring, on the other hand, takes time to assert itself. Over the Spring transition there is usually a good mix of sunny spells and the opportunities to make use of the light are more abundant.

Good times ahead.

Taking A Camera Everywhere

For the past 20 years one thing I’ve made sure I do is to take a camera with me wherever I go.

Leaf; Golden Acre Park, Leeds

For the longest time this has meant lugging a not-so-light camera bag everywhere.

These days smartphones mean that you don’t necessarily have to do that, but my experience with smartphones so far suggests that it’s still worth lugging around a weighty bag, just in case. This isn’t a reflection on the quality of smartphone cameras so much as a reflection on my choice of smartphones. My phone is cheap and the camera on it isn’t really all that amazing. Honestly, the camera wasn’t the main consideration when I bought my phone, specifically because I take a camera everywhere with me.

Strid Wood, Bolton Abbey

As well as a smartphone I also have a couple of GoPros, a bridge camera and a DSLR, and I even have a dashcam recording every mile in my car. I believe I’ve become addicted to documenting everything that happens, or at the very least having the ability to document everything at all times.

Dad feeding Maisie

Though it occasionally is a happy accident, not every photo that I take is intended as a work of art. My photography in general has two main facets, one of which is artistic expression and the other which is documentary. Occasionally, and I think these are my favourite photos of my own, my photographs are both. This probably makes sense because, to my mind at least, the best photographs are those which convey a story with an emotion attached, or which invoke an emotion related to the story by virtue of its expressive nature – artistry, if you will.

Maisie, Otley Chevin

Not all cameras are created equal. Although the latest GoPro cameras are able to store still images in RAW format, most smartphones and bridge cameras only save images in JPG format. RAW image formats contain significantly more detailed information captured by a camera sensor than JPG, but the extra data results in significantly larger file sizes in an image format which can’t be shared on Facebook, Instagram etc.

Discarded Roses, Lawnswood Crematarium

For purely documentary photography JPGs are generally adequate, but if your intention is to create art from your documentary photography, beyond very minor contrast/brightness tweaks, then it’s likely that you will want to edit your images after the fact. To do that most effectively requires that you shoot in RAW.

Of the cameras that I own, only my DSLR currently has the ability to store images in RAW format. And because every photograph I shoot, whether documentary or artistic, I want to have the option to create art with, it’s probably inevitable that I will continue to carry a heavy camera bag and lots of lenses everywhere I go.